The debate surrounding what makes the ideal man has taken a sharp turn with a recent article in The New York Times that proposes a new type of “dream guy.” This ideal man, as described by the article, is beefy, placid, and politically ambiguous—traits that are said to appeal to a modern, disillusioned male voter. However, this new narrative has sparked controversy, especially among the The Five panelists on Fox News, who quickly dissected the article, mocking its attempt to define masculinity.
The “New Dream Guy” – A Fiction or the New Norm?
https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&client=ca-pub-3619133031508264&output=html&h=280&adk=1696840892&adf=2954194363&w=736&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1756572993&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=3954777147&ad_type=text_image&format=736×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbb.xemgihomnay247.com%2Fthuphuong8386%2Fthe-new-dream-guy-is-this-what-democrats-really-think-men-want%2F&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=184&rw=736&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTkuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTM5LjAuMzQwNS4xMjUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siTm90O0E9QnJhbmQiLCI5OS4wLjAuMCJdLFsiTWljcm9zb2Z0IEVkZ2UiLCIxMzkuMC4zNDA1LjEyNSJdLFsiQ2hyb21pdW0iLCIxMzkuMC43MjU4LjE1NSJdXSwwXQ..&abgtt=6&dt=1756572992243&bpp=1&bdt=10354&idt=-M&shv=r20250827&mjsv=m202508270101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D9bf9426b22d2018f%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DALNI_Ma4wW3GKNBYZzWnxrO7qRgr_m3ZWg&gpic=UID%3D00001262c4fc9221%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DALNI_MYA82B7eqJVr-RsNbtVWkngKvVX0w&eo_id_str=ID%3D1b93066b25903ca0%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DAA-AfjaU1dvVoNA4o1EygmUIkynz&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1188x280%2C736x280%2C736x280&nras=2&correlator=4725291568656&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=-420&u_his=1&u_h=1080&u_w=1920&u_ah=1032&u_aw=1920&u_cd=24&u_sd=1&dmc=8&adx=54&ady=1752&biw=1188&bih=691&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=31094364%2C31094394%2C95362656%2C95369635%2C95369704%2C95370330%2C95370341%2C31094350%2C95368426%2C95370631&oid=2&psts=AOrYGsnZ2bG-xyasVoE1XeTNMy29pIJltcizXJjRHw0JMMDfVaU5tlOzCXmiWuRPQZaEP2cZrVm4rSjaqWNZb2B4dwORihY1g0RJvzrUC1M%2CAOrYGsl-kuKSvXTPTyB6Ov8IQlDZkPDhbSNDKPyCybb0uIjypW1_GkBMb6XyOvfaaTUAQb0u6jZVER2Q7I-Phv34PbGrrHxJwQoce33aXn8&pvsid=1393343398713388&tmod=1671558239&uas=1&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdailyhotnew.com%2Fthuphuong8386%2Fthe-new-dream-guy-is-this-what-democrats-really-think-men-want%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwY2xjawMgDIVleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETF2VmttTzJuR2FJRVNtc2s5AR52627hyXrEhELnzFQAK_pEZfFE4osm9I9u5vDtCBZ0z_FhNroci8gKpqSD7A_aem_ehT_DAPMVmBYIObCKigEDA&fc=1408&brdim=-43%2C22%2C-43%2C22%2C1920%2C0%2C1227%2C784%2C1203%2C691&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&bz=1.02&td=1&tdf=2&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&pgls=CAEaBTYuOC4y&ifi=11&uci=a!b&btvi=3&fsb=1&dtd=1560
The concept of a “new dream guy,” as imagined by The New York Times, seems almost too good to be true—or, in fact, too fictional to be real. Trey, a panelist on The Five, expressed skepticism, stating that this so-called “new dream guy” is a product of the liberal imagination and doesn’t exist in reality. According to the article, this man is politically ambiguous, a trait that could appeal to a generation tired of divisive politics. However, Trey points out that this ideal doesn’t resonate with men who feel like they’re being asked to apologize for their masculinity or assume a set of values they don’t necessarily agree with.
Greg Gutfeld, another The Five panelist, took it a step further, arguing that this new role model is another example of how the left is trying to redefine male identity. He suggested that the political pressure to conform to certain ideals, particularly those surrounding gender and politics, has led to male voters distancing themselves from progressive politics. “It’s not us; it’s you,” Greg said, criticizing the Democratic Party for pushing ideals onto men while alienating them in the process.
https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&client=ca-pub-3619133031508264&output=html&h=280&adk=1696840892&adf=1396106738&w=736&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1756572993&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=3954777147&ad_type=text_image&format=736×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbb.xemgihomnay247.com%2Fthuphuong8386%2Fthe-new-dream-guy-is-this-what-democrats-really-think-men-want%2F&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=184&rw=736&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTkuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTM5LjAuMzQwNS4xMjUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siTm90O0E9QnJhbmQiLCI5OS4wLjAuMCJdLFsiTWljcm9zb2Z0IEVkZ2UiLCIxMzkuMC4zNDA1LjEyNSJdLFsiQ2hyb21pdW0iLCIxMzkuMC43MjU4LjE1NSJdXSwwXQ..&abgtt=6&dt=1756572992243&bpp=1&bdt=10353&idt=-M&shv=r20250827&mjsv=m202508270101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D9bf9426b22d2018f%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DALNI_Ma4wW3GKNBYZzWnxrO7qRgr_m3ZWg&gpic=UID%3D00001262c4fc9221%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DALNI_MYA82B7eqJVr-RsNbtVWkngKvVX0w&eo_id_str=ID%3D1b93066b25903ca0%3AT%3D1756572987%3ART%3D1756572987%3AS%3DAA-AfjaU1dvVoNA4o1EygmUIkynz&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1188x280%2C736x280%2C736x280%2C736x280&nras=3&correlator=4725291568656&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=-420&u_his=1&u_h=1080&u_w=1920&u_ah=1032&u_aw=1920&u_cd=24&u_sd=1&dmc=8&adx=54&ady=2463&biw=1188&bih=691&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=31094364%2C31094394%2C95362656%2C95369635%2C95369704%2C95370330%2C95370341%2C31094350%2C95368426%2C95370631&oid=2&psts=AOrYGsnZ2bG-xyasVoE1XeTNMy29pIJltcizXJjRHw0JMMDfVaU5tlOzCXmiWuRPQZaEP2cZrVm4rSjaqWNZb2B4dwORihY1g0RJvzrUC1M%2CAOrYGsl-kuKSvXTPTyB6Ov8IQlDZkPDhbSNDKPyCybb0uIjypW1_GkBMb6XyOvfaaTUAQb0u6jZVER2Q7I-Phv34PbGrrHxJwQoce33aXn8&pvsid=1393343398713388&tmod=1671558239&uas=1&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdailyhotnew.com%2Fthuphuong8386%2Fthe-new-dream-guy-is-this-what-democrats-really-think-men-want%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwY2xjawMgDIVleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETF2VmttTzJuR2FJRVNtc2s5AR52627hyXrEhELnzFQAK_pEZfFE4osm9I9u5vDtCBZ0z_FhNroci8gKpqSD7A_aem_ehT_DAPMVmBYIObCKigEDA&fc=1408&brdim=-43%2C22%2C-43%2C22%2C1920%2C0%2C1227%2C784%2C1203%2C691&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&bz=1.02&td=1&tdf=2&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&pgls=CAEaBTYuOC4y&ifi=12&uci=a!c&btvi=4&fsb=1&dtd=1561
The “Beefy” Ideal and Its Consequences
What stood out to the The Five panel was the suggestion that men must be “beefy” but not “flaccid”—a term that sparked laughter among the hosts. The emphasis on physical strength, coupled with a lack of personality or political opinion, raised eyebrows. Joey, another panelist, argued that the concept of the “beefy” man was not new or surprising, but rather a reflection of what many people, particularly women, might want in a partner: someone who can take them on a date without delving too deeply into political discussions.
Joey’s sarcastic take on the article was that the so-called ideal man was essentially a Republican—a person who is fit, calm, and doesn’t talk about politics. This portrayal of the “new dream guy” fails to acknowledge the complexity and diversity of men’s personalities and choices in relationships, which, according to Joey, shouldn’t be limited by stereotypes.
Political Ambiguity and Male Voter Discontent
The question raised by The Five panelists is whether political ambiguity can truly be the answer to winning over male voters. The New York Times article suggested that the Democratic Party needed a new type of man who could appeal to a wide spectrum of voters by avoiding strong political opinions. The panelists, however, found this idea naïve, arguing that voters—particularly men—don’t want to be reduced to a set of characteristics or identity traits.
Jessica, another panelist, argued that the real solution for winning over male voters wasn’t about creating a fictional role model but about being authentic. According to Jessica, the real disconnect comes from the sense that the Democratic Party, with its preachy tone, alienates men who don’t necessarily want to conform to a set of expectations, whether political or personal. “Just be yourself,” she suggested. Authenticity, she argued, would be far more effective than trying to manufacture a new male ideal.
The core of the debate, as illustrated by the panel, is not just about what makes someone attractive but about how political agendas often shape personal identities. The “new dream guy” outlined by The New York Times suggests that masculinity can be commodified and shaped into something that appeals to a specific political ideology. This approach, however, overlooks the nuanced and diverse nature of human relationships.
Trey and Greg both emphasized that men have been pushed into uncomfortable corners, particularly when politics has been thrust into every aspect of life. The The Five panel criticized the idea that masculinity, or any personal identity, could be shaped by political correctness or the need to appease certain political groups. “We are done with your politics,” Greg boldly declared, signaling that many men feel disillusioned with the constant pressure to align with specific political or ideological expectations.
What Should the Left Do to Win Over Male Voters?
While the The Five panelists were highly critical of the New York Times article, they agreed on one thing: the left must do more than invent new role models. Instead, they must connect with voters on a personal level, without pandering or forcing conformity. Jessica’s suggestion that the left should focus on authenticity instead of creating manufactured figures resonates with the frustrations expressed by many male voters. “Be genuine, and let people make up their own minds,” she said, urging the Democratic Party to stop forcing ideologies on people.
The Future of Masculinity and Political Identity
The debate around the “new dream guy” ultimately reveals a larger issue with the current political climate. The pressure to define and redefine masculinity, as well as other aspects of personal identity, often comes at the expense of individuality and authenticity. Whether it’s through manufactured role models or forced political alignment, the demand for conformity alienates many voters—especially men—who feel that their identities are being shaped by others.
The core of the debate, as illustrated by the panel, is not just about what makes someone attractive but about how political agendas often shape personal identities. The “new dream guy” outlined by The New York Times suggests that masculinity can be commodified and shaped into something that appeals to a specific political ideology. This approach, however, overlooks the nuanced and diverse nature of human relationships.
Trey and Greg both emphasized that men have been pushed into uncomfortable corners, particularly when politics has been thrust into every aspect of life. The The Five panel criticized the idea that masculinity, or any personal identity, could be shaped by political correctness or the need to appease certain political groups. “We are done with your politics,” Greg boldly declared, signaling that many men feel disillusioned with the constant pressure to align with specific political or ideological expectations.
What Should the Left Do to Win Over Male Voters?
While the The Five panelists were highly critical of the New York Times article, they agreed on one thing: the left must do more than invent new role models. Instead, they must connect with voters on a personal level, without pandering or forcing conformity. Jessica’s suggestion that the left should focus on authenticity instead of creating manufactured figures resonates with the frustrations expressed by many male voters. “Be genuine, and let people make up their own minds,” she said, urging the Democratic Party to stop forcing ideologies on people.
The Future of Masculinity and Political Identity
The debate around the “new dream guy” ultimately reveals a larger issue with the current political climate. The pressure to define and redefine masculinity, as well as other aspects of personal identity, often comes at the expense of individuality and authenticity. Whether it’s through manufactured role models or forced political alignment, the demand for conformity alienates many voters—especially men—who feel that their identities are being shaped by others.
